Dissenting Opinion by Justice Mirabal in Harris County Flood Control Dist. v. Great American
Ins. Co. (pdf) (re immunity from liability and attorneys fees)    













DISSENTING OPINION

I respectfully dissent, in part.

I agree with the Majority’s disposition of issue one dealing with quantum meruit. However, I disagree with the
Majority’s disposition of issue two dealing with attorney’s fees.

We all agree that Section 271.152 of the Local Government Code waives governmental “immunity from suit” for
breach of contract. See City of Houston v. Petroleum Traders Corp., 261 S.W.3d 350, 359 (Tex. App.-Houston
[14th Dist.] 2008, rule 53.7(f) motion granted). “Breach of contract” is a “cause of action”.  In contrast, a claim for
attorney’s fees is not a “cause of action”; rather it is a remedy arising out of a cause of action. With regard to
attorney’s fees, the only immunity issue would be whether the governmental entity is “immune from liability” for
attorney’s fees.  The present case only involves issues of “immunity from suit”, not “immunity from liability”.  If a
governmental entity can be sued for breach of contract, as here, then it can be sued for damages; the types of
damages that can be recovered from the governmental entity, such as attorney’s fees, depends on whether the
entity has waived “immunity from liability” for such damages.

I agree with the reasoning of the Court, regarding claims for attorney’s fees, in State v. Mid-South Pavers, Inc.,
246 S.W. 3d 711, 729-30 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, no pet.).  I disagree with McMahon Contracting, L.P. v. City of
Carrolton, 277 S.W.3d 458, 465-66 (Tex. App. –Dallas 2009, no pet.), to the extent McMahon conflicts with Mid-
South.

I would sustain appellant’s issue one, and overrule appellant’s issue two. Accordingly, I would reverse the trial
court’s denial of appellant’s Plea to the Jurisdiction on appellee’s quantum meruit cause of action, I would affirm
the trial court’s denial of appellant’s Plea to the Jurisdiction regarding attorney’s fees, and I would remand the
case for further proceedings.
                                                            

                                         /s/                    
Margaret Garner Mirabal

                                                                 Senior Justice
   
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Seymore and Mirabal.[1] (Hedges, CJ. majority.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Senior Justice Margaret Garner Mirabal sitting by assignment.
Harris County Flood Control District v. Great American Ins. Co.
(Tex.App. - Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 25, 2010)(Hedges) (plea to the jurisdiction governmental
immunity, prompt payment act, quantum meruit)
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED & REMANDED IN PART: Opinion by
Chief Justice Hedges      
Before Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Seymore and
Senior Justice Margaret Mirabal    
14-09-00571-CV        Harris County Flood Control District v. Great American Insurance Company    
Appeal from 157th District Court of Harris County
Trial Court Judge:  
Randy Wilson
Dissenting Opinion by Justice Mirabal in Harris County Flood Control Dist. v. Great American Ins.
Co. (pdf) (would not dismiss attorneys fee claim as jurisdictionally barred)