David Rafes, Inc. v. Huml (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 29, 2009)(Jennings) (defamation business disparagement claim re product quality, tortious interference with prospective business relationships, substantial truth defense to defamation claim succeeds) AFFIRM TC JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Jennings Before Justices Jennings, Higley and Sharp 01-08-00856-CV David Rafes, Inc. v. Michael Huml and Slowboy Racing, Inc. Appeal from 11th District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Mark Davidson In sum, the trial court was presented with ample evidence substantiating the "gist" of the statements contained in the internet article regarding the production and manufacturing of the turbocharger. Accordingly, we hold that the evidence is legally and factually sufficient to support the trial court's implied finding that Rafes's claims against Huml and Slowboy were barred by the affirmative defense of substantial truth. We further hold that the trial court did not err in entering the take-nothing judgment against Rafes.