Opinions by Other Justices of the First Court of Appeals, sitting in Houston, Texas Chief Justice Sherry Radack Justice Tim Taft (resigned 2009) Justice Michael Massengale Justice Jim Sharp (elected 2008) Justice Sam Nuchia (former) Justice Terry Jennings Justice Evelyn Keyes Justice Elsa Alcala Justice George C. Hanks, Jr. Justice Laura Carter Higley Justice Jane Bland |
Justice Elsa Alcala (see official bio and photo) was appointed to the First Court of Appeals in 2002 and won voter approval in the general election later that year. She did not draw a Democratic opponent in the 2006 general election and was reelected. Justice Alcala is a former prosecutor in the Harris County District Attorney's Office and a former district court judge. Justice Alcala's JD is from the University of Texas School of Law. She earned her bachelor's degree from Texas A&M Kingsville. In FY 2008 Justice Alcala wrote 78 signed deciding opinions on the merits and 46 per curiam opinions. Justice Alcala rarely disagrees openly with her colleagues and wrote only two dissenting opinion over the course of the year. Her recent (Aug 2009), rather strongly-worded, disagreements with Justice Jennings thus come as something of a surprise. Jennings, though, has a more colorful history as a dissenter, and may have precipitated the heated exchange with his criticism of a panel opinion written by Alcala in a case involving an employment dispute. Find more info at the Houston-Opinions Home Page |
2010 Civil Case Opinions by Houston Appeals Court Justice Elsa Alcala |
2010 Opinions by Justice Elsa Alcala in Civil Appeals Also see --> 2009 Alcala Opinions in Civil Cases | 2008 Alcala Opinions Divorce court's property division reversed and remanded because trial court awarded separate property to the other spouse Kite v. Kite (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 11, 2010)(Alcala)(separate property in divorce, inception of title rule) (spouse's separate property may not be awarded to the other spouse in division of community property) We hold the trial court erred in divesting Michael of his separate property. This necessitates remand for a new division of the community estate. We reverse the portion of the final decree of divorce that divides the marital estate. We remand for a new division of the community estate and other appropriate proceedings. We affirm the final decree of divorce in all other aspects. AFFIRM TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT IN PART, REVERSE TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT IN PART, AND REMAND CASE TO TRIAL COURT FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS: Opinion by Justice Alcala Before Chief Justice Radack, Justices Alcala and Higley 01-08-00643-CV Michael David Kite v. Kendra Senja Kite Appeal from 246th District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Jim York Destruction of video recording of slip and fall no reason to overturn summary judgment in favor of grocery store in premises liability law suit Clark v. Randalls Food (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 25, 2010)(Alcala) (premises liability suit, spoilation of evidence claim rejected, video recording of incident not preserved) AFFIRM TC JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Elsa Alcala 01-08-00732-CV Ralph Clark v. Randalls Food [Randalls Food & Drug, L.P. was improperly named] Appeal from 157th District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Randy Wilson Alcala would rule in favor of Shell on fraudulent concealment issue re royalty underpayment claim Shell Oil Company v. Ross (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 25, 2010)(Jenning) (oil & gas law litigation - dispute over royalties, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and fraud theories) (fraudulent concealment as tolling theory, constructive notice based on public record) AFFIRM TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Terry Jennings Before Justices Jennings, Alcala and Higley 01-08-00713-CV Shell Oil Company, SWEPI LP d/b/a Shell Western E&P, Successor in Interest to Shell Western E&P, Inc. v. Ralph Ross Appeal from 133rd District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Lamar McCorkle Dissenting Opinion by Justice Alcala in Shell Oil Co. v. Ross (would hold that lawsuit is barred by limitations because no evidence establishes fraudulent concealment of royalty underpayment by Shell) I conclude that (I) the evidence conclusively shows that a reasonably diligent examination of documents would have revealed any misstatements within the period of limitations, and (II) no evidence shows that Shell used deception to conceal the wrong, nor that the Rosses relied on any representations by Shell. See id. The Rosses made no effort to contact Shell for more information, even though the Code gave them the express right to the information. At best, the Rosses have shown misstatements by Shell. But misstatements alone do not equate to use of deception to conceal a wrong. I would hold that no evidence supports Ross’s assertion of fraudulent concealment. Newsom v. Brazoria County Child Protective Services (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 25, 2010)(Alcala) (termination of parental rights appeal, ineffective assistance of counsel claim overruled) Appellant, Helen Newsom, challenges the trial court's termination of her parental rights to her minor children. In her sole issue, Newsom contends that her court-appointed attorney's performance at trial was so deficient as to constitute "no assistance" altogether. We conclude Newsom failed to show that her attorney rendered ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the trial court's judgment terminating the parent-child relationship between Newsom and her children. AFFIRM TC JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Elsa Alcala Before Chief Justice Radack, Justices Alcala and Higley 01-09-00447-CV Helen Newsom v. Brazoria County Child Protective Services, a Unit of the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services Appeal from 300th District Court of Brazoria County Trial Court Judge: Hon. K. Randal Hufstetler American Zurich Ins. Co. v. Samudio (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 11, 2010)(Alcala) (carrier loses workers compensation appeal over worker's impairment rating, plea to the jurisdiction in judicial review suit affirmed, attorney fees award for prevailing claimant workers comp appeal) Appellant, Zurich American Insurance Company (Zurich), a workers' compensation carrier, appeals from the trial court's judgment awarding attorney's fees to Daniel Samudio, appellee, and dismissing its appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Zurich had filed a petition for judicial review of a final decision by the Texas Department of Insurance Division of Workers' Compensation (Division) that held Daniel Samudio, appellee, had a 20 percent impairment rating. In three issues, Zurich asserts that (1) the trial court had jurisdiction to determine whether Samudio's impairment rating complied with the Texas Workers' Compensation Act, (2) Samudio's plea to the jurisdiction, taken to its logical extension, would obviate summary judgment practice, and (3) the trial court should not have ordered Zurich to pay Samudio's attorneys' fees. We conclude that (1) the trial court properly dismissed Zurich's judicial review action because it did not have jurisdiction under the Texas Workers Compensation Act to effect the remedies sought by Zurich, (2) a plea to the jurisdiction is a proper procedural vehicle for challenging a trial court's subject matter jurisdiction, and (3) the trial court properly ordered Zurich to pay Samudio's reasonable and necessary attorney's fees because Samudio was the prevailing party in the lawsuit. We affirm. AFFIRM TC JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Alcala Before Chief Justice Radack, Justices Alcala and Higley 01-08-00233-CV American Zurich Insurance Company v. Daniel Samudio Appeal from 127th District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Sharolyn P. Wood Marin v. IESI TX Corporation (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 11, 2010)(Opinion on rehearing by Alcala) (forgery, misapplication of fiduciary property, fraud, and conversion of checks, exemplary damages) We conclude that the trial court did not err in the admission of the evidence, that the evidence is legally and factually sufficient, and that the trial court properly awarded exemplary damages. We affirm. AFFIRM TC JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Elsa Alcala Before Justices Keyes, Alcala and Hanks 01-08-00539-CV Janell S. Marin v. IESI TX Corporation Appeal from 412th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County Trial Court Judge: Hon. W. Edwin Denman Brannan v. State of Texas (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 4, 2010)(Opinion on rehearing by Alcala) (Open Beaches Act, effect of moving line of vegetation on existing houses on beach, takings claim) This appeal concerns the application of the Open Beaches Act at Pedestrian Beach in the Village of Surfside Beach on the Gulf Coast of Texas. (1) Appellants, Angela Mae Brannan, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Bob Albert Brannan, deceased, Brooks and Mary Porter, Russell and Judy Clinton, Russell Clinton as Independent Executor of the Estate of Elizabeth Clinton, deceased, Reg and Beaver Aplin, Partners d/b/a Benchmark Developing, Louise Bullard, Diane Loggins Clark, Joseph Cornell Dewitt, Lisa Marie Dewitt Fuka, Macario Ramirez, Chrissie Dickerson, Jeffrey Dyment, the Marvin Jacobson Family Holding Company, Charles T., Cathy, James, and Patricia Meek, Mark Palmer, James C. and Patricia Pursley, Kenneth C. and Andrea Reutzel, S & S Holdings, LLC, and Rogers Thompson, Executor of the Estate of P.E. Kintz, deceased, (collectively, "the Owners"), have filed a motion for rehearing and for en banc reconsideration of our opinion issued on August 28, 2009. We deny the rehearing, but we withdraw our opinion and judgment of August 28, 2009 and substitute this opinion and judgment in their place. Because we issue a new opinion in connection with the denial of rehearing, the Owners' motion for en banc reconsideration of our prior opinion is moot. Richardson-Eagle, Inc. v. William M. Mercer, Inc., 213 S.W.3d 469, 472 (Tex. App.--Houston [1 Dist.] 2006, pet. denied). AFFIRM TC JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Alcala Before Chief Justice Radack, Justices Alcala and Hanks 01-08-00179-CV Angela Mae Brannan, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate of Bob Albert Brannan, Deceased, et al v. The State of Texas, et al Appeal from 239th District Court of Brazoria County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Patrick Edward Sebesta Forward v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole (pdf) (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 17, 2009)(Alcala) Appellant, John Patrick Forward, appeals the trial court's order that dismissed for want of prosecution his petition for expunction of records. In two issues, Forward contends the court abused its discretion in dismissing his expunction petition for want of prosecution because the trial court did not give Forward adequate notice that his petition would be dismissed for failure to prosecute his case, and he proved each of the requirements for having his record expunged. We conclude the trial court did not give adequate notice to Forward of its intent to dismiss the case. We, therefore, reverse and remand the case to the trial court. REVERSE TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT AND REMAND CASE TO TRIAL COURT FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS: Opinion by Justice Elsa Alcala Before Justices Keyes, Alcala and Hanks 01-07-00914-CV John Patrick Forward v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole Appeal from 80th District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Lynn Bradshaw-Hull Simien v. Unifund CCR Partners (pdf) (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 10, 2009)(Alcala) (credit card debt suit)(judgment for debt buyer affirmed) AFFIRM TC JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Alcala Before Justices Keyes, Alcala and Hanks 01-08-00593-CV Michelle D. Simien v. Unifund CCR Partners Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No 4 of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Roberta A. Lloyd Wright v. Atlantic Credit and Finance, Inc. (pdf)(Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 10, 2009)(Alcala) We conclude Wright did not plead the statute of limitations and Wright's deemed admissions and Atlantic's uncontroverted summary judgment evidence conclusively establish Atlantic's entitlement to recover on breach of contract and its entitlement to attorney's fees. We affirm. AFFIRM TC JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Alcala Before Justices Keyes, Alcala and Hanks 01-09-00135-CV Darryl G. Wright v. Atlantic Credit and Finance, Inc. Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No 4 of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Roberta A. Lloyd Imkie v. The Methodist Hospital (pdf)(Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Dec. 10, 2009)(effect of failure to respond to no-evidence motion for summary judgment, denial of motion for new trial affirmed) AFFIRM TC JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Alcala Before Justices Keyes, Alcala and Hanks 01-08-00831-CV Marwa Imkie v. The Methodist Hospital Appeal from 133rd District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Lamar McCorkle Mensa-Wilmot v. Smith International, Inc. (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Nov. 19, 2009)(Alcala) (breach of contract, option contract, untimely amendment of pleadings prior to summary judgment hearing, finality) AFFIRM TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Alcala Before Justices Keyes, Alcala and Hanks 01-08-00481-CV Graham Mensa-Wilmot v. Smith International, Inc. Appeal from 165th District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Elizabeth Ray DISSENTING OPINIONS BY JUSTICE ALCALA Alcala would rule in favor of Shell on fraudulent concealment issue re royalty underpayment claim Shell Oil Company v. Ross (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 25, 2010)(Jenning) (oil & gas law litigation - dispute over royalties, breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and fraud theories) (fraudulent concealment as tolling theory, constructive notice based on public record) AFFIRM TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Terry Jennings Before Justices Jennings, Alcala and Higley 01-08-00713-CV Shell Oil Company, SWEPI LP d/b/a Shell Western E&P, Successor in Interest to Shell Western E&P, Inc. v. Ralph Ross Appeal from 133rd District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Lamar McCorkle Dissenting Opinion by Justice Alcala in Shell Oil Co. v. Ross (would hold that lawsuit is barred by limitations because no evidence establishes fraudulent concealment of royalty underpayment by Shell) Jones v. City of Houston (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 27, 2009)(Jennings) (TTCA, drowning death of child, culvert without safety bars) ("we hold that the City's summary judgment evidence established as a matter of law that the Jones siblings could not recover as bystanders for any mental anguish and emotional trauma caused by their brother's drowning. ) (TTCA, drowning death of child, uncovered culvert, siblings' bystander claim for wrongful death of brother rejected, drowning deaths) AFFIRM TC JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Jennings Before Justices Jennings, Alcala and Higley 01-08-00905-CV Landon Jones and Loren Jones v. City of Houston Appeal from 215th District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: Hon. Levi J. Benton Dissenting Opinion by Justice Alcala in Jones v. City of Houston ("Courts have uniformly held that a loved one need not actually see the deceased take his last breath if there is an "experiential perception" of it. ... Because the reasonable inference of the evidence in a light favorable to the non-movant shows that the siblings were present when Logan drowned, I respectfully dissent to the majority's affirmance of the trial court's summary judgment, which precluded a jury trial in this case.") Alacala stands her ground in defense of panel opinion she authored and responds to Jenning's dissent on motion for en banc rehearing, which he would grant because of error by the panel Acala's Concurrence in Denial of En Banc Review in Macy v. Waste Management, Inc. (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 28, 2009) (Concurrence with denial of en banc reconsideration by Justice Alcala) proper designation of opinions issues by the court) OPINION CONCURRING WITH THIS COURT'S JUDGMENT: Concurring Opinion by Justice Alcala Before Chief Justice Radack, Justices Alcala and Hanks 01-07-00276-CV Griffin Macy v. Waste Management, Inc. Appeal from 157th District Court of Harris County Trial Court Judge: The Honorable Randall Wilson Also see --> 2009 Alcala Opinions in Civil Appeals 2008 Opinions in Civil Cases by Justice Elsa Alcala 2007 Civil Appellate Opinions by Justice Elsa Alcala |