Terminology: Motion to compel production | interrogatories | response to requests for production |
discovery mandamus | privilege claim | deemed admissions | discovery orders | scheduling order |
discovery control plan | timely response | discovery objections | failure to comply with discovery
deadline | failure to produce documents | nondisclosure | objections | assertion of privilege |
attorney-client privilege | work product privilege | confidentiality | disclosure of experts | designation |
proper scope of discovery | fishing expedition |
sanctions for discovery abuse |

In Re Jacobs, MD (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 20, 2009)(Brown)(discovery mandamus)
(
proper scope of net worth discovery when exemplary damages are sought for gross negligence)
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART: Opinion by
Justice Brown      
Before Justices Brown, Boyce and Sullivan  
14-09-00123-CV  In Re Mark A. Jacobs, M.D., and Debra C. Gunn, M.D., and Obstetrical and
Gynecologist Associates, P.A.    Appeal from Probate Court No 2 of Harris County
Trial Court Judge: Michael James Wood
Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by Justice Sullivan in In Re Jacobs, M.D.       

In re Memorial Hermann Healthcare System (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 9, 2008)(Hedges)
(discovery mandamus denied, privilege, anti-trust litigation)
MOTION OR WRIT DENIED: Opinion by Chief Justice Hedges  
Before Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Hudson and Frost
14-08-00204-CV In Re Memorial Hermann Healthcare System and Memorial Hermann Hospital
System--Appeal from 61st District Court of Harris County
Trial Court Judge:
Hon. John Donovan  

In Re Hicks (Tex.App. - Houston [14th Dist.] Sep. 25, 2008)(Dissent on en banc motion by Frost)
(
discovery disputes, privilege)
DISSENTING:
Dissenting Opinion by Justice Frost  
Before Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Brock Yates, Anderson, Guzman, Brown and Boyce
14-07-00590-CV  In Re: Michael Hicks and Jerry Fazio
Appeal from 155th District Court of Austin County
Trial Court Judge:  Judge Daniel R. Beck

In re Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc.  (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 28, 2008)(Hedges)
(discovery mandamus denied, motion to compel)
MOTION OR WRIT DENIED: Opinion by Chief Justice Hedges  
Before Price, Chief Justice Hedges, Justice Boyce
14-07-00899-CV        In Re: Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. and Azusa Land Reclamation, Inc.
Appeal from 215th District Court of Harris County
Trial Court Judge:
Hon. Levi James Benton        

In re Sedeno-Suarez (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Aug.. 28, 2008)(per curiam) (parallel civil and
criminal proceedings, discovery limitations, order of protection, invocation of fifth amendment privilege)
MOTION OR WRIT DENIED: Per Curiam  
Before Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Guzman and Brown
14-08-00740-CV        In Re: Heriberto Sedeno-Suarez, M.d., and Heriberto Sedeno-Suarez, P.A
Appeal from 280th District Court of Harris County

In re Heide Ortuno (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] July 24, 2008)(Brown)
(discovery mandamus denied, order of protection, privilege claim waived)
MOTION OR WRIT DENIED: Opinion by Justice Brown  
Before Justices Brock Yates, Guzman and Brown
14-08-00457-CV In Re: Heide Ortuno, Individually and as next friend of J.O. a minor child
Appeal from 215th District Court of Harris County
Trial Court
Judge: Levi James Benton

McInnis v. Mallia (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] June 17, 2008)(Corrected majority opinion by Frost)
(malpractice suit, no-evidence motion for summary judgment, no adequate opportunity to conduct
discovery)
We conclude the trial court abused its discretion in implicitly finding that this case fell outside the ordinary rule, as set
forth in the comment to rule 166a(i), and in allowing a no-evidence motion more than five months before the expiration
of the discovery period set forth in the docket control order.  See Brewer & Pritchard, P.C., 167 S.W.3d at 468.  
Ordinarily, a no-evidence motion is permitted after but not before the discovery period set by the pre-trial order.  See
Specialty Retailers, Inc., 29 S.W.3d at 145.  The trial court permitted a no-evidence motion less than halfway through
this period with no showing in the record to justify deviation from the general rule.  Under the particular circumstances
of this complex case,  McInnis was not provided an adequate opportunity to conduct discovery.
REVERSED AND REMANDED: Opinion by Justice Frost  
Before Justices Fowler, Frost and Seymore
14-06-00354-CV Janine Charboneau McInnis, D.V.M. v. Michael Mallia, J.D., The Mallia Law Firm,
P.C., Tommy Hastings, J.D.
Appeal from 281st District Court of Harris County
Trial Court
Judge: David J. Bernal
Dissenting Opinion by Justice Seymore  (adequate time for discovery)

In re Jeanie Nolle (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Jun 12, 2008)(Keyes)
(
discovery mandamus granted in part)
GRANT PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: Opinion by Justice Keyes  
Before Justices Taft, Keyes and Alcala
01-07-01065-CV        In re Jeanie Nolle and Technical Solutions, Inc.
Appeal from 113th District Court of Harris County
Trial Court
Judge: Hon. Patricia Hancock

In Re Heidi Ortuno (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] May 6, 2008)(per curiam) (discovery, nonparty,
expert report, privilege, TRCP 193.3, snap-back)
MOTION OR WRIT DENIED: Per Curiam  
Before Justices Brock Yates, Guzman and Brown
14-08-00227-CV In Re Heidi Ortuno, Individually and As Next Friend Of J. O.
Appeal from 215th District Court of Harris County
Trial Court Judge:  
Levi James Benton

Rowlands v. Unifund CCR Assignee of Citibank (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Mar. 27, 2007)(Justice
Frost)(
consumer debt case, deemed admissions)
AFFIRMED: Opinion by Justice Frost
Before Justices Fowler, Edelman and Frost
14-05-01122-CV        Keith Rowlands v. Unifund CCR as Assignee of Citibank
Appeal from Count Civil Court at Law No 3 of Harris County (
Judge Lynn M. Bradshaw-Hull)

In re BP Amoco Chemical Co (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 25, 2007)(per curiam)
(discovery mandamus)
MOTION OR WRIT GRANTED: Per Curiam
Before Justices Anderson, Hudson and Guzman
14-06-00778-CV        In Re: BP Amoco Chemical Company and BP Products North America, Inc.
Appeal from 212th District Court of Galveston County (
Judge Susan Criss)

Smith v. County of Galveston (Tex.App.- Houston [1st. Dist.] Jan. 31, 2008)(Jennings)
(discovery dispute, motion to compel, attorney malpractice)
AFFIRM TC JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Jennings
Before Chief Justice Radack, Justices Jennings and Bland
01-07-00634-CV Glenn F. Smith v. County of Galveston, Texas
Appeal from 122nd District Court of Galveston County (Hon. John Ellisor)
We review a trial court's discovery orders for an abuse of discretion. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913, 917
(Tex. 1991). Here, for various reasons, we cannot determine whether the trial court abused its discretion. First, we note that the motion to
compel was never ruled upon by the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P. 33.1. Second, to the extent Smith is arguing that the trial court
abused its discretion in not ruling upon the motion to compel, Smith, in his appellate briefing, only references the motion to compel in
general terms. Smith asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion in its entirety; he neither identifies any
specific requests, nor does he specifically address the objections asserted in the discovery responses by Galveston or ABL. "A claim of
error on appeal must be argued in the party's brief; it is insufficient simply to refer the appellate court to the party's trial court arguments."
Allen v. United of Omaha Life Ins. Co., 236 S.W.3d 315, 325 (Tex. App.--Fort Worth 2007, pet. filed). Because Smith, in his brief on
appeal, does not address his specific requests or the specific objections posed by Galveston or ABL, we cannot determine whether the
trial court abused its discretion in failing to compel, in only general terms, responses to Smith's discovery requests. See id.

In Re Crown Castle Int. Group (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 29, 2008)(Hedges) (discovery
mandamus granted, protective order, biz organization law, shareholder suit)
MOTION OR WRIT GRANTED: Opinion by Chief Justice Hedges
Before Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Guzman and Boyce
14-07-00460-CV In Re: Crown Castle International Corp
Appeal from 234th District Court of Harris County (
Honorable Reece Rondon)

No blanket assertion of the fifth amendment privilege to thwart discovery in civil case when
criminal cases in pending contemporaneously
In Re Alvarez (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 29, 2007)(per curiam)(discovery, assertion of fifth
amendment privilege against self-incrimination in civil proceeding, mandamus denied)
DENY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: Per Curiam
Before Justices Nuchia, Jennings and Keyes
01-07-00569-CV In re Luis Alonzo Alvarez
Appeal from 129th District Court of Harris County (
Hon. Grant Dorfman)

In Re Citizens Supporting Metro Solutions, Inc. (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist,] Oct. 18,
2007)(Seymore)(substitute opinion)(discovery dispute in
suit involving elections and local politics)
MOTION OR WRIT DENIED: Opinion by Justice Seymore
Before Justices Frost, Seymore and Guzman
14-07-00190-CV In Re: Citizens Supporting Metro Solutions, Inc
Appeal from 234th District Court of Harris County (
Hon. Reese Rondon)

In Re Intracare Hospital (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Sep. 13, 2007)(per curiam)
(HCLC, discovery mandamus, assertion of privilege, privilege log)
MOTION OR WRIT GRANTED: Per Curiam
Before Justices Brock Yates, Anderson and Hudson
14-07-00127-CV In Re: Intercare Hospital D/B/A Intracare Medical Center Hospital
Appeal from 333rd District Court of Harris County (
Hon. Joseph J. Halbach)

In Re General Agents Ins. Co. of America, Inc. (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] May 15,
2007)(Hedges)(discovery mandamus)
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART: Opinion by Chief Justice Hedges
Before Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Brock Yates and Seymore
14-06-00930-CV In Re: General Agents Insurance Company of America, Inc.
Appeal from 165th District Court of Harris County (
Judge Elizabeth Ray)

In Re Broin and Associates, Inc. (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] May 15, 2007)(per curiam
dismissal)(discovery mandamus)
DISMISSED: Per Curiam (settled)
Before Justices Fowler, Edelman and Frost
14-06-01052-CV In Re: Broin and Associates, Inc
Appeal from 165th District Court of Harris County (
Honorable Elizabeth Ray)

In Re General Agents Ins. Co. of America, Inc. (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] May 15,
2007)(Hedges)(discovery mandamus)
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART: Opinion by Chief Justice Hedges
Before Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Brock Yates and Seymore
14-06-00930-CV In Re: General Agents Insurance Company of America, Inc.
Appeal from 165th District Court of Harris County (
Judge Elizabeth Ray)

In Re General Agents Ins. Co. of America, Inc. (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] May 15,
2007)(Hedges)(discovery mandamus)

In re Westwood Affiliates, LLC (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 8, 2007)(Hanks)
(discovery mandamus, motion to compel, police records, privilege)
DENY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: Opinion by Justice Hanks
(Before Justices Taft, Keyes and Hanks)
01-06-00471-CV        In re Westwood Affiliates, L.L.C.
Appeal from 127th District Court of Harris County

In re Mid-Century Ins. Co. (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 6, 2007)(per curiam)(discovery order)
MOTION OR WRIT DENIED: Per Curiam
(Before Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Fowler and Edelman)
14-06-01115-CV        In Re: Mid-Century Ins
Appeal from Co Civil Court at Law No 4 of Harris County (Judge Roberta Anne Lloyd)

Court grants mandamus to prevent release of document for which hospital asserted
medical peer review privilege

In Re Intercare Hospital (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Sep. 13, 2007)(per curiam)
(discovery mandamus, assertion of privilege, privilege log, in camera inspection)
MOTION OR WRIT GRANTED: Per Curiam
Before Justices Brock Yates, Anderson and Hudson
14-07-00127-CV In Re: Intercare Hospital D/B/A Intracare Medical Center Hospital
Appeal from 333rd District Court of Harris County (
Honorable Joseph Halbach)
Discovery Case Law - Houston Appellate Court
Houston Opinions
TEXAS SUPREME COURT CASES

Supreme Court grants mandamus in
apex deposition dispute
In re BP Products North America, Inc.,
No. 07-0119 (Tex. Jan. 25, 2008)(Gaultney, sitting by
assignment)(Discovery dispute, apex deposition, Rule
11 agreement, motion to quash deposition, protective
order, discovery mandamus granted)

In Re Sci Texas Funeral Services, Inc. No. 06-0385 (Tex.
Oct. 12, 2007)(per curiam)
(class action decertification,
discovery sanctions)

In Re Allstate County Mutual Ins. Co., No. 06-0878  (Tex.
Jun. 15, 2007)(per curiam)(discovery
limitations)(mandamus granted)

In Re Christus Spohn Hospital, No. 04-0914 (Tex. Apr.
27, 2007)(O'Neill)(mandamus)(evidence, production,
privilege, snap-back provision)

In re Ford Motor Co., No. 05-0696 (Tex. Dec. 22,
2006)(mandamus)(per curiam)(discovery, protective
order)
Houston Case Law
Practice Areas
and Legal Topics
ADR in Family Court
Amicus & Ad Litem
Attorney's Fees
Animal Law Cases
Arbitration Case Law
Attorney Fee Litigation
Auto Accident Cases
Bill of Review Cases
Car Wreck Litigation
Child Support Cases
City of Houston Cases
Consumer Case Law
Condemnation Suits
Constitutional Challenges
Construction Law
Contractors & Subcontractors
Contempt of Court
CPS DFPS Termination Suits
Credit Card Debt Suits
Default Judgments
Discovery Disputes
Divorce Suits & SAPCR
Division of Property
Election Law Litigation
Eminent Domain Cases
Employment Law
Ethics and Recusal
Expunction Cases
Family Law Cases
Family Mediation ADR
Firefighter Litigation
Foreclosure
Foreign Judgments
Forum and Venue
Fraudulent Transfers
Government Entities
Grandparent Rights
Health Care Coverage
Healthcare Liability
Homeowner Law
Insurance Litigation
International Family Law
Juvenile Court Cases
Labor and Employment
Breach of Lease Cases
Landlord-Tenant Disputes
Medical Coverage
Medical Malpractice
Modification SAPCR Suits
Official Immunity Cases
Paternity Suits
Post-Divorce Actions
Premises Liability
Probate Court Cases
Product Liability
Property Tax Appeals
Public Employment
Real Estate Litigation
Restaurant Litigation
Restricted Appeal
Sanctions Case Law
SAPCR Modification
School Law Cases
School Districts
Slip and Fall Suits
Sovereign Immunity
Temporary Injunctions
Texas Tort Claims Act
Worklpace Safety Injury
Venue Challenges
HOUSTON CASE LAW BLOG
AUSTIN CASE LAW BLOG
6/28/09
 
Old Harris County Civil Courthouse