The purpose of a temporary injunction is to preserve the status quo pending trial, but it is an extraordinary remedy and
does not issue as a matter of right.  Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198, 204 (Tex. 2002). Trial courts have broad
discretion in deciding whether to grant or deny a temporary injunction, and an appellate court should reverse only if it
finds a clear abuse of that discretion.  Tel. Equip. Network, Inc. v. TA/Westchase Place, Ltd., 80 S.W.3d 601, 607 (Tex.
App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.).  We should not reverse a trial court’s temporary injunction unless it is “so
arbitrary as to exceed the bounds of reasonable discretion.”  Id.  We review the evidence in a light most favorable to the
trial court’s order, but an erroneous application of the law to undisputed facts constitutes an abuse of discretion.  Id.  

To obtain a temporary injunction, an applicant must prove (1) a cause of action against a defendant, (2) a probable right
to the relief sought, and (3) a probable, imminent, and irreparable injury in the interim.  Butnaru, 84 S.W.3d at 204.  An
injury is irreparable if there is no adequate remedy at law; if for example, a prevailing applicant could not be
compensated adequately in damages, or if damages cannot be measured by any certain pecuniary standard.  Id.  While
the board members contend that none of these elements exists, the absence of any one renders an award of temporary
injunctive relief inappropriate.  See id. Source:
Benefield v. State of Texas, No. 01-07-00970-CV (Tex.App.- Houston [1st
Dist.] Aug. 14, 2008)(Bland)

Decisions in Appealed Cases Involving Temporary Orders and TROs from
the First and Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Bruns v. Top Design Inc. (Tex.App. - Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 2, 2008)
(temporary injunction order void, no bond)
REVERSE TC JUDGMENT AND RENDER JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Nuchia  
Before Chief Justice Radack, Justices Taft and Nuchia
01-08-00070-CV        Dennie Bruns v. Top Design Incorporated
Appeal from 56th District Court of Galveston County
Trial Court Judge: Hon Lonnie Cox

In re Anthony Santos (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Aug. 26, 2008)(per curiam)
(signing of final order moots mandamus pertaining to temporary SAPCR orders)
DISMISSED: Per Curiam  
Before Justices Fowler, Frost and Seymore)
14-08-00303-CV In Re Anthony L. Santos
Appeal from 300th District Court of Brazoria County

Benefield v. State of Texas (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 14, 2008)(Bland)
(quo warranto proceeding, receivership, interlocutory appeal, orders granting a temporary injunction
and order appointing receiver reversed)
REVERSE TC JUDGMENT AND REMAND CASE TO TC FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS: Opinion by
Justice Bland  
Before Justices Taft, Jennings and Bland
01-07-00970-CV Nancy Benefield, Nancy S. McNulty, Naomi Morales, Robert Seton, Ruthie Parker,
Susan Berkley, Gloria Reeves, Shirley Buelow and Angela Breedlove v. The State of Texas on Relation
of the Alvin community Health Endeavor, Inc. and Brazoria County, Texas
Appeal from 239th District Court of Brazoria County

Henry v. McMichael, (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 24, 2008)(Hanks)
(dominant jurisdiction, temporary injunction appeal)
AFFIRM TC JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Hanks
Before Justices Taft, Hanks and Higley
01-07-00622-CV David Henry v. James McMichael and Elizabeth Ann Koehler Co-Independent
Executors of The Estate of W.T. McMichael and Catherine McMichael
Appeal from County Court at Law No 1 & Probate Court of Brazoria County
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Jerri Lee Mills  

Cedyco Corp. v. Tubbs (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Mar. 13, 2008)(Frost)
(writ of execution, trial court's temporary injunction vacated, no jurisdiction)
REVERSED AND REMANDED: Opinion by Justice Frost
14-07-00399-CV Cedyco Corporation v. Carolyn Tubbs
Appeal from 280th District Court of Harris County
Trial court judge:
Honorable Tony Lindsay  

EPG, Inc.v RDM, Inc. (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 7, 2008)(Anderson) (temporary injunction
appeal, injunction vacated)
REVERSED AND DISMISSED: Opinion by Justice Anderson
Before Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Anderson and Seymore
14-07-00415-CV EPG, Inc. & Stanton Holt v. RDM, Inc.
Appeal from 129th District Court of Harris County (
Judge Grant Dorfman)

Tanguy v. Laux (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 3, 2008)(Alcala)(temporary injunction, UFTA)
AFFIRM TC JUDGMENT: Opinion by Justice Alcala
Before Justices Taft, Keyes and Alcala
01-07-00765-CV Phillipe Tanguy v. David Laux
Appeal from 165th District Court of Harris County
Trial Court Judge:
Hon. Elizabeth Ray  

Court of appeals grants mandamus to set aside temporary order for attorney's fees
In re Heather Sartain (Tex.App.- Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 3, 2008)(Nuchia) (family law,
temporary order for attorneys fees, mandamus granted, divorce, SAPCR proceedings, order granting
interim attorney's fees lifted]
GRANT PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: Opinion by Justice Nuchia
Before Justices Nuchia, Hanks and Higley
01-07-00920-CV In re Heather Sartain
Appeal from 306th District Court of Galveston County
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Janis L. Yarbrough  

Temporary Injunction Reversed by Appellate Panel
EPG, Inc.v RDM, Inc. (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 7, 2008)(Anderson)
(
temporary injunction appeal)
REVERSED AND DISMISSED
: Opinion by Justice Anderson
Before Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Anderson and Seymore
14-07-00415-CV EPG, Inc. & Stanton Holt v. RDM, Inc.
Appeal from 129th District Court of Harris County (
Judge Grant Dorfman)

Sharma v. Vinmar International, No. 14-05-01088-CV (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 25, 2007)
(Anderson)(
temporary injunction appeal, accelerated)
AFFIRMED: Opinion by Justice Anderson
Before Justices Anderson, Hudson and Guzman
14-05-01088-CV        Ravin Sharma, Ashvin Dhingra, Amit Bansal, James Rew, Chemtrade Solutions,
Inc., Yang Woo Chemical America, Inc., and J& J Chemtrading v. Vinmar International, LTD
Appeal from 333rd District Court of Harris County (Judge not shown on docket)
Separate opinion in Sharma v. Vinmar International (Tex.App.- Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 25, 2007)
(separate opinion by Guzman)
CONCURRING/DISSENTING: Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by Justice Guzman

DENY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: Per Curiam
(no mandamus relief against TRO denying access to children) (Before Justices Taft, Jennings and
Alcala)
01-07-00674-CV In re Sharon Keith
Appeal from 312th District Court of Harris County
Trial court judge:
Hon. James D. Squier
Temporary Injunction Appeals in the Houston Courts of Appeals
Also see -->
Houston Opinions | Texas Opinions
Old Harris County Civil Courthouse
Find Houston
Cases and
Case Law on ...

ADR in Family Court
Amicus & Ad Litem
Attorney's Fees
Animal Law Cases
Arbitration Case Law
Attorney Fee Litigation
Auto Accident Cases
Bill of Review Cases
Car Wreck Litigation
Child Support Cases
City of Houston Cases
Consumer Case Law
Condemnation Suits
Constitutional Challenges
Construction Law
Contractors &
Subcontractors
Contempt of Court
DFPS Termination Suits
Credit Card Suits
Default Judgments
Discovery Disputes
Divorce Suits & SAPCR
Division of Property
Election Law Litigation
Eminent Domain Cases
Employment Law
Ethics and Recusal
Expunction Cases
Family Law Cases
Family Mediation ADR
Firefighter Litigation
Foreclosure Law
Foreign Judgments
Government Entities
Grandparent Rights
Health Care Coverage
Healthcare Liability
Homeowner Law
Insurance Litigation
International Family Law
Juvenile Cases
Labor and Employment
Breach of Lease Cases
Landlord-Tenant Disputes
Medical Coverage
Medical Malpractice
Modification SAPCR Suits
Official Immunity Cases
Paternity Suits
Post-Divorce Actions
Premises Liability
Probate Court Cases
Property Tax Appeals
Public Employment
Real Estate Litigation
Restaurant Litigation
Restricted Appeal
Sanctions Case Law
SAPCR Modification
School Law Cases
School Districts
Slip and Fall Suits
Sovereign Immunity
Temporary Injunctions
Texas Tort Claims Act
Worklpace Safety Injury
Venue Challenges
HOUSTON CASE LAW BLOG
AUSTIN CASE LAW BLOG